In at least one image, it seems to be adding pixel-level artifacts and notably decreasing contrast, but I basically paid $28 and some change when you divide the total bundle cost of $85 for the three Topaz programs by three. I found that for the quality of files I obtain from GFX 100s, image quality is sacrificed with Gigapixel AI. No matter, purchased as as part of a discounted bundle for $85, I use Gigapixel AI every day. That is large enough for many things, but it is not large enough to cover a big wall without tiling. Initially, in using Gigapixel AI, I was a little dismayed that the largest image files one can produce from it are 32,000 pixels per side. I like stuff sharp, large, and printed large. The camera I use is a Fuijifim GFX 100s, and I shoot full-size (11,648 x 8,736 files), using edited RAW files about half the time ad SOOC JPEGS about the other half the time.
I printed one 11x14 this year, one 13x19, and the rest were 35x40 or larger. I also definitely don't like looking at pixellation, and I like my images large. I know, I was probably dropped on my head as an infant. I never see a soft person, object, still life, or whatever.
I admit that I am a resolution freak, and I also don't like looking at things that seem "soft", as that is never what I see when I look at something (so long as I have my glasses on). Someone posted a discount code on DPR, so I got an additional discount and got the bundle for about $85. A few weeks ago I purchased the discounted bundle of Topaz' Gigapixel AI, DeNoise AI, and Topaz Sharpen AI.
0 kommentar(er)
